Skip to content
imessageapi
BlueBubbles logoBlueBubblesOpenBubbles

OpenBubbles vs BlueBubbles: two different projects, almost the same name

One relays the Messages app on a Mac you own out to your other devices. The other registers an Android handset with Apple directly, so it becomes a blue bubble under its own number. Only one of them can be automated, and neither belongs in front of a customer.

The verdict

BlueBubbles if you own a Mac and want your own iMessages on Windows, Linux or Android — it is also the only one of the two with a local API worth automating against. OpenBubbles if what you actually want is for an Android phone to be blue in your friends' group chats, and you accept a consumer product with no API and no guarantee it works next month. For customer messaging, neither: that is what a hosted line is for.

6 min readUpdated August 27, 2026Head to head

These two get compared because of the names. They are not variants of one another — they take fundamentally different approaches to the same wall, and the approach determines everything else about them.

The architectural difference, which is the whole comparison

BlueBubbles — a relay

  • A server process on a Mac you own and keep running
  • That Mac's Messages app does the actual sending
  • Clients for Windows, Linux and Android talk to it
  • Messages carry the Mac's Apple Account identity
  • A local REST API, so software can drive it

OpenBubbles — a registration

  • The Android handset talks to Apple's servers itself
  • One-time access to a Mac or iPhone to register
  • The blue bubble carries the Android phone's own number
  • FaceTime as well as iMessage
  • No API — it is a chat app, not infrastructure
BlueBubblesOpenBubbles
Needs an always-on MacYesNo — one-time registration only
Whose number the bubble showsThe Mac's Apple AccountThe Android handset's own number
CostFree; you pay for the Mac and the electricityFree self-hosted, or $16.99/month hosted
Automation APIYes — local REST, webhooksNone
Group chats and tapbacksYesNot clearly documented; verify
SMS fallbackNoNo
PlatformsWindows, Linux, Android, web-adjacent clientsAndroid
Continuity riskmacOS updates break relays routinelyRegistration is the pattern Apple has shut down before
As of August 2026. Both are moving targets; verify against each project before committing an evening.

The risk is not the same risk

BlueBubbles fails the way a home server fails. macOS updates itself, something in the automation path changes, the Mac reboots into a login screen and nothing sends until someone walks over to it. Annoying, recoverable, and entirely under your control.

OpenBubbles carries a different exposure. Registering a non-Apple device with Apple's messaging service is precisely the thing Beeper Mini did in December 2023, and Apple shut that down within days. Whatever your view of the ethics, the operational read is unambiguous: this approach has an adversary who has acted before and can act again, on a timeline you do not control.

Both put your personal Apple Account on the table

Automating a consumer Apple Account is against Apple's terms, and account lockout is a real outcome rather than a theoretical one. That account probably also holds your photos, your backups and your purchases. Weigh the free software against what is on the other side of that login.

Which to pick, if you are picking

  • You have a Mac and want your messages everywhere. BlueBubbles. Mature, open source, well documented, and the clients are good.
  • You want to build something small against your own messages. BlueBubbles, and only BlueBubbles — OpenBubbles exposes nothing to build on. Beeper's Desktop API is the other option in that shape, with an MCP server included.
  • You are on Android and tired of being green. OpenBubbles is the only project that solves that under your own number rather than relaying someone else's identity.
  • You have no Mac and no iPhone at all. Neither works. There is no route to iMessage that does not touch Apple hardware somewhere.

If this is for a business, stop here

Both of these are personal tools, and the failure modes that make them charming as hobby projects are disqualifying as infrastructure: a personal number instead of a business line, an Apple Account that is one enforcement action from gone, no delivery reporting, no SMS fallback so Android customers are simply unreachable, and a Mac in a cupboard as your single point of failure.

The hosted equivalent starts at $19/month and moves all of that onto somebody else's hardware and somebody else's Apple accounts. Hosted API vs self-hosted bridge works through the trade in full, and the cheapest hosted options is the short version.

Common questions

What is the difference between OpenBubbles and BlueBubbles?
BlueBubbles runs a server on a Mac signed into your Apple Account and relays that Mac's Messages app to clients on other platforms — your messages still come from the Mac's identity. OpenBubbles registers the Android device itself with Apple's servers, so the blue bubble carries the Android phone's own number. BlueBubbles needs the Mac permanently; OpenBubbles needs a Mac or iPhone once, to register.
Is OpenBubbles a fork of BlueBubbles?
No. The names invite the assumption, but they are separate projects solving different problems. BlueBubbles is a relay; OpenBubbles is a registration client.
Can I use either one for business messaging?
No, and both projects are clear about what they are. BlueBubbles has an API but sends from your personal number and personal Apple Account. OpenBubbles has no API at all. Both automate a consumer account in a way Apple's terms do not permit, and both fail in a way that takes your Apple Account with them.